The results of a massive new DNA sequencing project on the New York City subway have just been published. And yup, there's a lot of bacteria on the subway—though we know most of it is harmless. What's really important, though, is what we don't know about it.
The PathoMap
project, which involved sampling turnstiles, benches, and keypads at
466 stations, found 15,152 life-forms in total, half of which were
bacterial. The Wall Street Journal has created a fun, interactive microbial map of the subway
out of the data, showing where on the lines the bacteria "associated
with" everything from mozzarella cheese to staph infections was found.
But "associated with" is a pretty fuzzy term that runs up against the limits of science. In
the past few years, genetic sequencing has become vastly more powerful
and cheap, making metagenomic analyses possible. This means we can take
all of the DNA in an environmental sample—human, plant, bacteria,
cockroach, whatever—and sequencing the hell out of it.
The
problem, though, is that our genetic libraries are still incomplete. For
example, if I don't know what the DNA sequences of a cockroach look
like, how can I know my DNA sequence belongs to a cockroach? That's how
why half the DNA found in the project matched no known organism.
This is
especially true when it comes to bacteria that are being discovered for
the first time in these new metagenomic analyses. And what does
"associated with," when it comes to bacteria, really mean? Maybe we
found a certain bacterium on cheese once, but maybe we never sampled its
true native habitat?
Even the
best technologies we have now are ultimately crude tools to grope at a
vast, unseen world. It maybe be hard to intuit whether it make sense
for Acinetobacter or Enterococcus to be on the
subway, but the research team found plenty of non-microbial DNA, too,
and a lot of it didn't make sense. According to the WSJ, human DNA was
prevalent, as were beetle and fly DNA. Those make sense. (We actually
don't know about cockroaches because their genome hasn't been sequenced
yet.)
The
next most prevalent type of DNA, though, was cucumber. Cucumber? When
was the last time you saw someone gnawing on a cucumber on the subway?
More likely, the computer program grouped all plant material under
cucumber.
And then there were the straight up weird ones, according to the WSJ.
Initial database searches with subway DNA, for instance, turned up false matches to the Tasmanian devil, the Himalayan yak and the Mediterranean fruit fly—all creatures highly unlikely to be found in a New York transit system.
That's why
some of the microbial DNA found that sounds alarming—anthrax, for
instance—is no reason to be calling Homeland Security just yet.
None of
this detracts, of course, from how incredibly interesting urban
microbiology really is. The city is an organism, and we're slowly
beginning to understand its microbiome. Studying how bacteria—be they
pathogens or scavengers or simply harmless microbes—spread through the
urban environment could yield new insights into how a city works.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment